Last year NASA made a sensational claim about discovery
of DNA in which the phosphorous is
replaced by arsenic. The bacterial
strain GFAJ-1 was isolated from the arsenic-rich sediments of
California’s Mono Lake by its ability to grow in the artificial Mono Lake
medium without phosphate but with high concentrations of arsenate. It was
claimed that GFAJ-1 grew in -P medium only when arsenate was provided, and significant amounts of arsenate were detected
in subcellular fractions. This was
interpreted as “ growth due to use of
arsenate in place of phosphate”. Wolfe-Simon et
al. further reported that arsenic was incorporated into the
DNA backbone of GFAJ-1 in place of phosphorus, with an estimated 4% replacement of P by As based on
the As:P ratio measured in DNA samples embedded in agarose gel slices.
This
discovery claim by NASA Scientists was
sensational as
it changes the basic rules of life and prompted many to think that life is much more diverse than we know before so we can expect life forms with different basic components in different planets. But many Scientists were skeptical about this and predicted possible phosphate contamination in the media used. Two recent studies have found that media contamination may have contributed attributed to the bacterial growth and not arsenic replacement of phosphorous .
it changes the basic rules of life and prompted many to think that life is much more diverse than we know before so we can expect life forms with different basic components in different planets. But many Scientists were skeptical about this and predicted possible phosphate contamination in the media used. Two recent studies have found that media contamination may have contributed attributed to the bacterial growth and not arsenic replacement of phosphorous .
In recent
paper published ahead of print in Science journal Erb
et al (2012) have shown that , although the bacterium is able to grow under
high-arsenate and low-phosphate conditions, it needs to be supplied with some
amount of phosphate in order to grow at all. They found no evidence of arsenic
substitution for phosphorus in the bacterium's metabolism. Phosphorus remained
essential for the organisms to grow, they conclude, although that particular
strain of bacterium is able to grow at much lower phosphate concentrations than
other arsenate-resistant strains. In another independent study published
simultaneously, Reaves
et al (2012) have shown that arsenic does not contribute to the
bacteria's growth and the faulty findings is attributed to trace contamination with phosphorous that let the bacteria grow.
0 comments:
Post a Comment